20:1720:17, 20 September 2008diffhist−54
William Nierenberg
"Instead, it rejected the interpretation of those facts as a problem." clarified rather than reduced to 'the report was largely in line with' "twaddle". Have report, don't need blog cite.
12:4912:49, 19 September 2008diffhist+269
William Nierenberg
rv - Do you have a clue about Wikipedia policy? [WP:VERIFY]. If you cannot verify your claim then it doesn't belong . My edit has reliable source, yours doesn't. Find the source then make the edit.
09:5409:54, 19 September 2008diffhist+269
William Nierenberg
Sorry the 1983 was a mistake. So use the respected source: "So Reagan commissioned a third report about global warming from Bill Nierenberg". A blog is not a respected source, not allowed by Wikipedia
07:3007:30, 19 September 2008diffhist+385
William Nierenberg
The link you provide says the commission was in place, but its formal charge wasn't established till next year. I've clarified that, added the summary using a respected source rather than a blog.