00:2500:25, 25 September 2018diffhist+328
Ahvaz military parade attack
There is absolutely no reason to move a terror attack which equally targeted military and civilians into a conflict infobox. Which is not even used in small scale clashes. Also the conflict infobox is severely lacking.
19:0719:07, 23 September 2018diffhist−260
Ahvaz military parade attack
ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack yesterday, today ISIS posted video of the attackers before the attack. ISIS is the confirmed perpetrator, the other groups which have claimed responsibility have no evidence regarding the attack. Come up with a point if you believe this is untrue before reverting.
16:4616:46, 23 September 2018diffhist−22,557
State-sponsored terrorism
Undid revision 860845312 by Fitzcarmalan (talk) Can you give a reason on the revert rather than if it is on me or you? How do you believe reverting the article which breaks the rules of Wikipedia I have given should be reverted as you did, without any discussion neither on edit summary or talk page? Give a reason on how you believe the rules broken are unimportant or a possible solution, and discussfirst before further reverting.Tag: Undo