20:2820:28, 2 June 2023diffhist−237
Spider-Verse
Removing overly detailed (and uncited) comment which is unsuitable for an introduction. Broad overview for a new reader is the goal, not narratively wandering off into minutia.
13:4313:43, 24 April 2023diffhist−272
Bruce Ratner
Reverting what seems to be a bad faith edit. Linked source is a private group opposed to Ratner, not a verifiable secondary source. Also, no evidence of "often known and criticized for..."Tag: Manual revert
20:0120:01, 30 March 2023diffhist−7
John Wick: Chapter 4
powerful but not senior in the context of this movie. It's specifically stated that he was recently raised to the High Table to kill JW
20:4120:41, 8 January 2023diffhist−43
1899 (TV series)
no citation, no matching comment from a critic in the Reception section, and against Wikipedia's style guidelines to avoid weasel words
18:1718:17, 6 August 2022diffhist−125
Soul Man (film)
removing rather odd editorial comment which appears to argue with the previous cited quotation. If one has a citable rebuttal to that quotation they wish to add, go for it, but please don't add WP:OR commentary.
18:3618:36, 3 June 2022diffhist−805
Lazarus (comics)
I've looked at the other two sources and see why they were removed. Blogs such as those are against Wikipedia's guidelines for verifiability (see: WP:SPS). With only the one-issue review from Newsarama (an okay source, but again, it's a review of one issue and not actually critiquing the pacing), these are still uncited comments. Take to talk page please.Tag: Manual revert
14:1814:18, 3 June 2022diffhist−599
Lazarus (comics)
Removing what appear to be opinion, OR or bad faith criticism edits. The only citation regarding pacing is a roundup blog entry that mentions a slow down in pace in one issue (and doesn't describe such in as negative). If this critics summation is restored, it needs multiple, and better, citations.
17:4217:42, 5 May 2022diffhist−108
The Doctor (Doctor Who)
removing 14 year old tag per WP:MPR on the basis of a) at least some citation although more should be added and b) a silent consensus based on limited changed over the past 5 years
16:2516:25, 10 April 2022diffhist−97
Snow Crash
Removing these as a) there is a link to the source material in the wiki article blue-linked here and b) there's also a citation to it at end of the very next line. I respect wanting to improve citations, but please avoid doing so unnecessarily as that smacks of WP:Point. This article needs work more than criticism.