12:5612:56, 4 September 2011diffhist−374
Austrian school of economics
Undid revision 448389614 by BigK. The issue is not about the source, but about the content. This comment is redundant, ad hominem and misplaced in this article. It belongs in the Mises article.
11:5011:50, 1 September 2011diffhist−1,772
Austrian school of economics
Undid revision 447830366 by LK. I've noticed no such consensus. Moreover, the criticism in p.2 was not deleted, it was merged with and retained in p.1. The previous text itself expressed their close connection.
19:2119:21, 26 August 2011diffhist−2,079
Austrian school of economics
→Criticism: Removed paragraph 2, as the criticism in question was already formulated in paragraph 1. No point or reason for first criticizing the Austrian school and then its "leaders" for the very same thing.