02:4002:40, 24 January 2024diffhist+7,075
Turco-Persian tradition
→Greater Iran: I will however revert the edits done by historyofIran, these edits are source provided and do indeed indicate that there was a Turko-Persian culture in these empires, removing major parts of the page that has been around for years (Ottomans) and removing it without much of a valid reason, historyofIran should instead go to the talk page and state his case there until then I see no reason to not undo the edit done by him.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
01:0601:06, 24 January 2024diffhist+7,074
Turco-Persian tradition
→Greater Iran: You must have quite a sad life to maliciously edit a bunch of Turkic related wiki articles furthermore going as far and trying to undo not just my but other users sourced backed edits by searching up their edit history all because your previous reports were dismissed, you edit these pages because they don't fit your narrative, I don't answer to threats make whichever report you'd like the truth is edits should be made from a NPOV something you're clearly not doing.Tags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
01:0001:00, 24 January 2024diffhist+1,400
Karluks
→History: Undoing malicious editing by user historyofIran as the material was sourced. Refrain from editing stuff out because they don't fit your bias or narrative (NPOV).Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
01:1701:17, 15 January 2024diffhist+834
Safavid Iran
There is number 1, don't remove the other links I'll cite a page for EVERY one of em :) . How about you make sure you come with a source that disproves everything earlier stated about the ancestry of Ismail I and his 3 successors.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
01:1301:13, 15 January 2024diffhist+1
Safavid Iran
For your sake I'd be willing to cite every page on each source that I post, that is if you don't continue edit warring and removing them :).Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
01:1201:12, 15 January 2024diffhist+825
Safavid Iran
Go ahead, lying and being dishonest is not w good trait to have, but I, can't say I'm shocked. Please go ahead and source check all the links.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
01:0001:00, 15 January 2024diffhist+1
Safavid Iran
I also don't think I have to remind you of Wikipedia's edit warring rules, if you want to change it again I will take action.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
00:5400:54, 15 January 2024diffhist+14
Safavid Iran
Safavids were Turco-Persian and for most of their history heavily, Intermixed with Turkic tribes the correct way to term them is therefore Turco-Persian not Turkified (as explained earlier). Shah Ismail married a Turkmen princess (from the Mawsillu tribe) as did his 3 successors. Ismail I largely Turkic origin from his half Turkic father (Sheikh Haydar) and half Turkic mother's side (Halima Begum) is also no secret or that he is the grandson of Aq Qoyunlu (Turko-Persian empire) ruler Uzun Hasan.Tags: Manual revertRevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
00:1300:13, 15 January 2024diffhist0 m
Turco-Persian tradition
Safavids were a Turco-Iranian dynasty. The Sheikhs of the Safavi order prior to Ismail I his father were non Turkic, however Turkic influince has always been there starting from the foundation of Safavi Iran. Ismail I who was Uzun Hasan's nephew (practically raised by him) being mainly Turkic in ancestry & marrying a Turkmen princess (Mawsillu tribe (1st 3 generation of rulers married from them), Safavi's military language being Turkic & the Kizilbash solely being Turkic until the 16th century.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
23:4123:41, 14 January 2024diffhist+1 m
Safavid Iran
These are obviously not the only factors making them Turco-Persian or Turko-Iranian, but to say the Safavids were just Turkified is historically wrong since by the time of Ismail I (the founder of the Safavi dynasty) they were already ethnically mainly Turkic therefore can't be "Turkified", with that Turkic ancestry only becoming more significant for the 3 rulers after Ismail who all had significant Turkmen Mawsillu origin, until Abbas I.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
23:3423:34, 14 January 2024diffhist+14 m
Safavid Iran
Safavids weren't Turkified, they were a Turco-Iranian dynasty. The Sheikhs of the Safavi RELIGIOUS ORDER prior to Ismail I his father were non Turkic, however Turkic influince has always been there starting from Ismail I who was Uzun Hasan nephew (practically raised by him) being mainly Turkic in ancestry & marrying a Turkmen princess (Mawsillu tribe (1st 3 generation of rulers married from them), Safavi's military language being Turkic & the Kizilbash solely being Turkic until the 16th century.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
8 January 2024
20:3120:31, 8 January 2024diffhist0
Zengid dynasty
Uploaded a map of the Zengids at a time of their height when the Ayyubids were a vassal and the Zengids controlled alot more land (Egypt for instance was acquired in 1169).Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
23:4423:44, 7 December 2023diffhist−12 m
Jie people
Most sources on this wiki page argue they're Turkic, there's also multiple Turkic translations of the known Jie phrases (while only 1 in Yenisseian).Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
19:1919:19, 2 May 2023diffhist+1 m
Hemshin people
https: //nisanyanmap.com/?y=&lv=&t=hOPA&cry=&ua=5 on this website you can source check the old Ottoman names of the villages within the district of Hopa yourselves.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
19:1219:12, 2 May 2023diffhist+1
Hemshin people
Furthermore because the majority of villages in Hopa district are not Hemshin, the town of Hopa can also not have a menshin majority or plurority because prior to 2000 so in the 1990s 2/3rd of the district population lived in those villages and in 1940 that was 90%, so if those villages are not even plurority Hemshin then the city or district can't be either. So I'm changing Hopa district to Minority Hemshin instead of plurority. If someone can prove otherwise I'd like to see a source edit.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
19:0419:04, 2 May 2023diffhist−1
Hemshin people
Hemshin's are not the plurority in Hopa district. The majority of villages in the district are Laz villages which you can see from the old Ottoman names for those villages, as only 4 out of 16 villages did not have Laz/Georgian names in Ottoman times, even the town Hopa does not have a plurority Hemshin population or majority, for the district of Hopa to be Plurority Hemshin.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
03:0103:01, 14 February 2023diffhist+13
Blockade of Nagorno-Karabakh
Again bad faith editing/if not purposefully trying to push a political narrative. The article on Amnesty International doesn't state the ICRC claims there is a shortage, rather Amnesty does through statements from locals in Nagorno Karabakh.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
02:5902:59, 14 February 2023diffhist−168
Blockade of Nagorno-Karabakh
Again I checked there is no mention in any of those articles about Azerbaijani state involvement or state affiliated org's, any further revision back will be bad faith editing.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
02:3402:34, 14 February 2023diffhist+13
Blockade of Nagorno-Karabakh
"==Vehicle passage statistics are already mentioned under humanitarian aid and by reputable sources: that is, the International Red Cross themselves." Then I'll add it in that section, arguing that Azerbaijani sources are/could be non reputable (when I'm sure these 2 Azerbaijani sources are reputable) should then also apply to the numerous .arm sites aswell (seeing as you've used them). As for the sources on azerbaijani gov- involvement/gov- affiliated org's being there I shall check it again.Tags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit