02:4902:49, 26 September 2019diffhist+1,165
Talk:RJ Nieto
→Social Media Entries As Citation: this argument is getting gruelling. yes there are exceptions to using social media as citation but so far no one has justified that such exceptions applies to the context of RJ Nieto's article about fake news, which is about disputable facts.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
16:2616:26, 21 September 2019diffhist−4,286
RJ Nieto
The administration notice clearly stated that FB-cited content are OR. And sites like memebuster that are tabloid journalism cannot be used for biographical articles. Also stated in the notice that contentious and libelous content must be removed especially those that are poorly cited. Most citations you provided are OR and cited on tabloid websites.Tag: Undo
04:1204:12, 21 September 2019diffhist−4,286
RJ Nieto
MemeBuster and Facebook are not reliable sources according to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources plus the section is contentious about a living person which is against wikipedia terms
20 September 2019
11:1711:17, 20 September 2019diffhist−2,523
RJ Nieto
section is libelous. removed statements cited on irrelevant implications that does not even mention or concern the subject.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
06:5506:55, 12 August 2018diffhist+960
Mocha Uson Blog
→Notable Posts: added content and section. encyclopedia entry about a blog should provide notable posts of the blog as the reason why it is needed to be in an encyclopedia in the first placeTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
07:5207:52, 19 July 2018diffhist−42
Victor Magtanggol
"Seen on TV" is not a valid reference/ Original Research / WP:OR. There also seems to be a dispute regarding the "theme song" so this article should be flagged for edit warring.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
12:2612:26, 13 July 2018diffhist+254
Victor Magtanggol
the added content is encyclopedic as well as the source is valid. do not condescend people in removing valid citations. it can be rewritten without the "fan criticism" and make it concisely informative. @HotWikiTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
04:3504:35, 11 July 2018diffhist−4,940
RJ Nieto
removed entire section because majority of the references cited are facebook posts which are not valid references according to wikipedia guidelines.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
07:4307:43, 15 June 2018diffhist+22
Mocha Uson
fixedt grammar and removed redundant language (reward and utang na loob is redundant)Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
06:2406:24, 12 June 2018diffhist+32
Mocha Uson
translated better what is written in the cited articles because the rewordings are misleading.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:4909:49, 11 June 2018diffhist−5,395
RJ Nieto
→Intersectional and Other Criticism: This subsection contains content that are not written in the citations given, i.e. "could be" implies an ORIGINAL RESEARCH. Also removed is a portion cited to Rappler's "about us" article, and other content that doesn't even involve Nieto at all. What a bloated ORIGINAL RESEARCH subsection is this. Only left contents cited to sources that tackles Nieto per se.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:3909:39, 11 June 2018diffhist−3,378
RJ Nieto
→Notable posts: this entire subsection is referenced to facebook posts, twitter posts, youtube videos and the subject's own website plus opinions that are not found somewhere else on trusted sources. AKA original research which is not valid wikipedia source. DO NOT REVERT unless you can give valid citationsTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:3409:34, 11 June 2018diffhist−101
RJ Nieto
Give a citation for being "peer reviewed" and external sources validating wikipedia's article on fake news.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:3109:31, 11 June 2018diffhist−76
Mocha Uson
sources didn't prove that the claim is a fact, but based only on opinions of the journalist and their interpretation of the appointment. Also mocha's mononym is redundant if written as a nickname. better provide sources why mocha is her nickname and mononym in the first place. Keep wikipedia neutral and avoid edit warring 💩👶Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
05:4305:43, 10 June 2018diffhist−56
Go Back (TV series)
→Plot: plot sections should not contain questions as the purpose of writing a plot is to write all substantial details of the story. questions belong to teasers and synopsis of a story.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit