4 November 2022
- 18:5918:59, 4 November 2022 diff hist +4 m LGB Alliance No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 18:5018:50, 4 November 2022 diff hist +5 m LGB Alliance The proposal of adding "hate" to the lead is on the talk page, not addressed - please refer to the discussion of the proposal before engaging in any reversal or further edits. Tag: Reverted
24 October 2022
- 12:4512:45, 24 October 2022 diff hist +139 User talk:Sweet6970 →Inappropriate removal of category from article 2: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:4012:40, 24 October 2022 diff hist +495 m Talk:LGB Alliance →Raising the major issue of categorisation in this article, hate group?
- 12:3812:38, 24 October 2022 diff hist 0 Talk:LGB Alliance →Raising the major issue of categorisation in this article, hate group?
- 12:3812:38, 24 October 2022 diff hist +31 Talk:LGB Alliance →Raising the major issue of categorisation in this article, hate group?
- 12:3712:37, 24 October 2022 diff hist −3 Talk:LGB Alliance →Raisin the major issue of categorisation in this article, hate group?
- 12:3712:37, 24 October 2022 diff hist +1,378 Talk:LGB Alliance No edit summary
23 October 2022
- 23:1723:17, 23 October 2022 diff hist +695 User talk:Alarics →LGB Alliance inappropriate reversion of edit: Reply Tag: Reply
21 October 2022
- 22:3722:37, 21 October 2022 diff hist −1,461 User talk:ObjectiveBiology →October 2022 Tag: Blanking
- 22:3522:35, 21 October 2022 diff hist −21 User talk:Alarics →LGB Alliance unjustified reversion of edit, please revoke your edit
- 22:3322:33, 21 October 2022 diff hist +1,249 User talk:Alarics No edit summary
- 20:0120:01, 21 October 2022 diff hist +401 User talk:Sweet6970 →Inappropriate removal of category from article
- 19:5419:54, 21 October 2022 diff hist +1 LGB Alliance No edit summary
- 19:5219:52, 21 October 2022 diff hist +684 m LGB Alliance Please do not remove my edit, as this is an objective fact recognised by many human rights groups.
- 19:4219:42, 21 October 2022 diff hist +9 m LGB Alliance You have deleted my contribution to the article that designated the LGB alliance as a hate group, while the article clearly cites a plethora of resources that designates the campaign as a hate group. This is much like the KKK is described on wikipedia is a hate group here. Can you please elaborate on why you edited this contribution? ObjectiveBiology (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC) [ reply ]
- 19:4119:41, 21 October 2022 diff hist +511 N User talk:2A02:C7F:3435:B000:A907:D6A0:6CE:369E →LGB alliance designation as a hate group: new section current Tag: New topic
- 19:3819:38, 21 October 2022 diff hist +5 LGB Alliance Undid revision 1117445197 by 2A02:C7F:3435:B000:A907:D6A0:6CE:369E (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
- 19:3119:31, 21 October 2022 diff hist −8 LGB Alliance No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 19:2719:27, 21 October 2022 diff hist +4 LGB Alliance No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 19:2219:22, 21 October 2022 diff hist −7 m LGB Alliance No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 19:2119:21, 21 October 2022 diff hist +514 m LGB Alliance Citing and adding material to the LGB alliance's status as a hate group. This is an objective fact, much like climate change has consensus. Therefore, consider the danger before you edit my edit. Tag: Reverted
 |
|