12:1812:18, 20 January 2022diffhist−934
Priyamvada Gopal
Too slanted and poor word economy. Reinstated the previous, more concise and neutral version. Updated citations and templates again for verification. Please use talk page to avoid edit warring.Tags: citing a blog or free web hostReverted
07:0807:08, 8 July 2021diffhist−11
Priyamvada Gopal
Undid revision 1032352127 by Xxanthippe (talk) The wiki editor is not casting judgement. Gopal has stated that she is a Brahmin and comes from a Brahmin family. The citation is unambiguously explicit about this.Tag: Undo
07:1907:19, 21 June 2021diffhist+1,415
Priyamvada Gopal
Moved 'Churchill, empire and race' from 'Race' to 'Empire' section as it is closer to it in theme. Also added more detail to the section.
14 June 2021
06:1706:17, 14 June 2021diffhist−571
Tony Sewell
Section on the Race report updated to include expert/scholarly criticism. Gopal's criticism is in line with what was canvassed on her article.
03:2803:28, 3 May 2021diffhist−997
Priyamvada Gopal
Removed The Times and Aaronovitch's personal attacks - there is no consensus for its inclusion. Other editors have already raised concerns over its use in the article.Tag: Reverted
04:4504:45, 30 April 2021diffhist+929
Priyamvada Gopal
Undid most of the revision by Pikavoom. Unclear how the edit does not accurately capture the 'controversies' Gopal is involved with. Revision summary gave no adequate explanation other than 'promotional'. The section complies with WP:NPOV and WP:VTag: Reverted
04:0004:00, 29 April 2021diffhist+2,053
Priyamvada Gopal
Reworded Sewell section to bring it in line with WP:V policy - previous section reinstated without consensus. Regarding the 'Controversies' section, see my comments in Talk.Tag: Reverted
06:4206:42, 25 April 2021diffhist−1,969
Priyamvada Gopal
Reworded Sewell section to bring it in line with WP:V policy. RM subjective expressions from lead: please avoid using value-laden expressions such as whether something positive and negative. It is for the reader to ascertain and determine what is good, bad, indifferent etc. They should not get presented with a binary choice. Regarding the 'Media attention' section, see my comments in Talk.Tag: Reverted
23 April 2021
07:3307:33, 23 April 2021diffhist−2,095
Priyamvada Gopal
Undid revision by 15. 15, Yes. I guess it's easier to believe it's a comparison when intellectual honesty and rigour are replaced by letting others do your 'thinking' for you. Regarding the section heading, see my comments in Talk. At this point, happy to keep reverting edits that are malign and foolish, though I will yield if there's a broad consensus among respected and experienced editors.Tags: Manual revertReverted