15:2215:22, 4 February 2021diffhist−14
Abhira dynasty
Rmv Unsourced content about caste in lead it's better to keep caste out of leadTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
14:0114:01, 4 February 2021diffhist−598
Abhira people
Self revert Raj era sources are considered unreliable by other editorsTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
10:0210:02, 4 February 2021diffhist+2,578
Abhira people
Go through the references first before edit warring like you have been doing here since ages the chudama references provided by me which you removed are more scholarly than all the references provided here Undid revision 1004777310 by HinduKshatrana (talk)Tags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
09:4709:47, 4 February 2021diffhist−641
Abhira people
Removing .After going through the reference provided the source doesn't mentions abhiras as Kshatriyas.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
08:5708:57, 4 February 2021diffhist+72
Abhira people
Undid revision 1004537952 by 103.240.192.116 (talk)Tags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
08:2108:21, 4 February 2021diffhist+768
Abhira people
No edit summaryTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
08:1708:17, 4 February 2021diffhist−747
Abhira people
→Rule of the Junagadh: The sources cited DONT back up the claims presented first source doesn't even mentions abhiras and their relationship with chudasama.Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
08:0908:09, 4 February 2021diffhist+14
Abhira people
→History: Fix linkTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
08:0708:07, 4 February 2021diffhist+161
Abhira people
No edit summaryTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
08:0108:01, 4 February 2021diffhist+1,318
Abhira people
→History: Adding content from rima hoojas bookTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit