This account is currently partially blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

22:38, 15 November 2021 Valereee talk contribs changed block settings for RBut talk contribs blocking the pages The Game Changers and Talk:The Game Changers with an expiration time of indefinite (Revising. This editor probably needs to appeal rather than wait out a time limit.) Tag: Twinkle

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

18:1618:16, 5 December 2023 diff hist +113‎ Talk:Revolution of Dignity ‎No edit summary
17:4217:42, 5 December 2023 diff hist +511‎ Talk:Revolution of Dignity ‎No edit summary
16:4516:45, 5 December 2023 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Revolution of Dignity ‎No edit summary
16:4416:44, 5 December 2023 diff hist +229‎ Talk:Revolution of Dignity ‎No edit summary
16:2916:29, 5 December 2023 diff hist +281‎ Revolution of Dignity ‎ Undid revision 1188405157 by Rsk6400 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted
16:2316:23, 5 December 2023 diff hist +753‎ Talk:Revolution of Dignity ‎No edit summary
13:2913:29, 5 December 2023 diff hist +355‎ Talk:Revolution of Dignity ‎No edit summary
12:0512:05, 5 December 2023 diff hist +666‎ Talk:Revolution of Dignity ‎No edit summary
05:0005:00, 5 December 2023 diff hist +281‎ Revolution of Dignity ‎ POV claims proved false in talk section. By the looks of it to me, consensus is reached on that point. As for grammar or details, talk section is unproductive. If there are such issues, fix the grammar or details in the article. If you will undo this edit, then fix the problem (e.g. grammar or details) in talk section, but at that point, might as well just do it in the article. Do not undo this, provide no fix, and then ghost the talk section. This would be bad faith. Tag: Reverted

11:4411:44, 26 November 2023 diff hist +374‎ Revolution of Dignity ‎ Undid revision 1181207477 by Rsk6400 (talk). What POV? The way it is framed now is POV. It pretends that Russia did nothing but pressure Ukraine to reject it, while in reality it provided an alternative ($15 billion, and significant gas price reduction) which Ukraine's leadership preferred (they also didn't have to get rid of corruption). As for not being important enough in the lead, it's a central factor in the debacle. Tags: Undo Reverted

09:3209:32, 20 October 2023 diff hist +34‎ m Revolution of Dignity ‎ Added hyperlink to wiki's article. Tag: Reverted
09:2509:25, 20 October 2023 diff hist +340‎ Revolution of Dignity ‎ It's true as it says in the article that Russia did not want this deal to go through, and pressured Ukraine. But they did more than that. They also offered a sweet heart deal which the Ukrainian leadership preferred as they would not have to get rid of the many types of corruption that Europe's deal required. Tag: Reverted

09:2309:23, 1 February 2023 diff hist +15‎ Chiang Kai-shek ‎ Minor grammar change
09:1409:14, 1 February 2023 diff hist +486‎ Chiang Kai-shek ‎ Copy/pasted citation from above, that was asked for 12 years ago below
09:0609:06, 1 February 2023 diff hist +5‎ Chiang Kai-shek ‎ Minor grammar change
09:0109:01, 1 February 2023 diff hist −14‎ Chiang Kai-shek ‎ Moved a paragraph to where it is discussed right above
08:4908:49, 1 February 2023 diff hist −55‎ Chiang Kai-shek ‎ Minor grammar change and removed a confusing sentence
08:3408:34, 1 February 2023 diff hist +6‎ Chiang Kai-shek ‎ Minor grammar change
08:2908:29, 1 February 2023 diff hist +1‎ Chiang Kai-shek ‎ Minor grammar change
08:2808:28, 1 February 2023 diff hist +172‎ Chiang Kai-shek ‎ Minor grammar change plus some additional details