20 November 2023
- 10:4610:46, 20 November 2023 diff hist +2 User talk:Ruhrob →Answer to 331dot Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:4610:46, 20 November 2023 diff hist +543 User talk:Ruhrob →Answer to 331dot: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
19 November 2023
- 21:1321:13, 19 November 2023 diff hist +249 User talk:Ruhrob →Appeal to block: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
5 November 2023
- 16:3016:30, 5 November 2023 diff hist +104 User talk:Ruhrob →Appeal to block: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 16:2316:23, 5 November 2023 diff hist −4 User talk:Ruhrob →Appeal to block Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:2316:23, 5 November 2023 diff hist +35 User talk:Ruhrob →Appeal to block Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:5213:52, 5 November 2023 diff hist −687 User talk:Ruhrob No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:5309:53, 5 November 2023 diff hist +376 User talk:Ruhrob →Appeal to block: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
4 November 2023
- 20:4920:49, 4 November 2023 diff hist +259 User talk:Ruhrob →Block: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
3 November 2023
- 17:2717:27, 3 November 2023 diff hist +108 Talk:The Daily Telegraph →Political spectrum in lead: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 17:2617:26, 3 November 2023 diff hist +185 Talk:The Daily Telegraph →Political spectrum in lead: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 16:5516:55, 3 November 2023 diff hist −88 User:Ruhrob ←Blanked the page Tags: Blanking Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:5316:53, 3 November 2023 diff hist +163 Talk:The Daily Telegraph →Political spectrum in lead: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 16:4016:40, 3 November 2023 diff hist +295 Talk:The Daily Telegraph →Political spectrum in lead: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 16:3616:36, 3 November 2023 diff hist +2 User:Ruhrob No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:3216:32, 3 November 2023 diff hist +1 Talk:The Daily Telegraph →Ideological position Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:3216:32, 3 November 2023 diff hist +312 Talk:The Daily Telegraph →Ideological bias: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- 16:2916:29, 3 November 2023 diff hist −160 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Still, there is no relation to the topic. If you disagree, take it to the talk page Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:2616:26, 3 November 2023 diff hist −268 Hakeem Jeffries The citation isn't related to this statement. And the language that is used here is very subjective, that goes against tge principles of neutral point of view Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 16:2316:23, 3 November 2023 diff hist +419 Talk:The Daily Telegraph →Ideological bias: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
- 16:2016:20, 3 November 2023 diff hist −268 Hakeem Jeffries Once again, there is no citation. Citation for the next sentence isn't related to this statement Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:2312:23, 3 November 2023 diff hist −13 The Ingraham Angle I'm ready to discuss, but until the controversial information should be deleted Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:2312:23, 3 November 2023 diff hist −268 Hakeem Jeffries No citation. The information is questionable Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:2212:22, 3 November 2023 diff hist −48 The Daily Telegraph Deleting bias Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:4810:48, 3 November 2023 diff hist −13 The Ingraham Angle Just because one source describes as conservative, doesn't mean that it is. What is the credibility of the source? Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:4310:43, 3 November 2023 diff hist −5,052 m Conservative Party (UK) No consensus for this Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:3809:38, 3 November 2023 diff hist +13 m Labour Party (UK) Additional information added Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 09:3109:31, 3 November 2023 diff hist +37 Labour Party (UK) Added additional information Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:4508:45, 3 November 2023 diff hist −160 m Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez What's the significance of this information? It's not related to the topic Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
31 October 2023
- 12:2112:21, 31 October 2023 diff hist −13 The Ingraham Angle Removal of ideological bias Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:1312:13, 31 October 2023 diff hist +508 Talk:Hakeem Jeffries →Bias: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
- 12:1012:10, 31 October 2023 diff hist −267 Hakeem Jeffries The information is subjective and biased + no linked Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:0912:09, 31 October 2023 diff hist +86 N User:Ruhrob ←Created page with 'Wikipedia is extremely ideologically bias. It needs to be changed. That's my goal here' Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:0712:07, 31 October 2023 diff hist +709 User talk:62.217.185.52 →October 2023 2: Reply current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
15 October 2023
- 15:2215:22, 15 October 2023 diff hist −36 The Daily Telegraph No citation. The information is questionable Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:2015:20, 15 October 2023 diff hist +234 Talk:The Guardian →Bias: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
14 October 2023
- 16:3916:39, 14 October 2023 diff hist −42 Liberal Party (Brazil, 2006) the significance of the information? Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 October 2023
- 06:3706:37, 5 October 2023 diff hist −84 Democratic Unionist Party The information is outdated. Here is a link: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/paula-bradley-dup-gay-rights-b1876971.html Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
4 October 2023
- 20:5120:51, 4 October 2023 diff hist −84 Democratic Unionist Party deleting questionable information Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
28 September 2023
- 20:4020:40, 28 September 2023 diff hist +201 Talk:Democratic Party (United States) →Ideology: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
19 September 2023
- 07:1807:18, 19 September 2023 diff hist +198 Talk:Washington State Democratic Party →Bias: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
- 07:1707:17, 19 September 2023 diff hist +198 Talk:Washington State Republican Party →Bias: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
