15:5415:54, 9 February 2024diffhist−1,617
Poppers
→19th-century discovery: Not supported by the source. Butyl nitrites was discovered and developed in the 1960s: https://www.wweek.com/news/2022/06/04/doctors-say-it-can-kill-you-but-butyl-nitrite-is-a-legal-high-in-portland/ and https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/explainer-the-science-of-alkyl-nitrites-aka-poppers/4014395.articleTag: Reverted
22:0322:03, 29 October 2023diffhist+1,069
Online Safety Act 2023
Undid revision 1182486906 by RunningTiger123 (talk) rv unexplained removal ouf sourced material. This section actually helps the article. Without it, the article has no supporting sources for the Act, and would otherwise have to be deleted or reverted to the previous article about the Bill.Tag: Undo
01:4201:42, 29 October 2023diffhist+663
Online Safety Act 2023
References to demonstrate that non publication is unsusual and that in it practice that all new Acts are published on Legislation.gov.uk on Royal Assent.
01:3501:35, 29 October 2023diffhist−46
Online Safety Act 2023
Undid revision 1182344802 by RunningTiger123 (talk) Not OR see " All Bills currently before the UK Parliament are listed on the UK Parliament website in the Parliamentary Business, Bills & Legislation section. They are published on this site once they rec"The aim is to publish legislation on this site simultaneously, or at least within 24 hours, of its publication in printed form." on https://www.legislation.gov.uk/new/ andTag: Undo
21:4121:41, 27 October 2023diffhist+12
Online Safety Act 2023
Corrected instances where references and sources referred to the draft Bill, not the Act. Reaosn: there's no reliable reference citation for the Act. The statements in the article are only supported by references to the draft Bill.
17:4517:45, 27 October 2023diffhist+31
Online Safety Act 2023
Added ((Disputed)) tag: The references and citations in this article exclusivey refer to the draft Online Safety Bill. However, this article is about the published law: the Online Safety Act. There is - surprisingly - no reference, link or citation to the text of the published text of the law; and no supporting third party sources to back up claims about the published law - ie the Online Safety *Act*.Tag: Twinkle
21:3121:31, 6 September 2023diffhist+155
Electroejaculation
Reverted good faith edits by 2601:6C1:C200:B230:C4AA:A146:46B8:8B54: The gif does appear to illustrate the article. Personal 'disgust' is not a valid reason to remove content. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sexual_content and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Offensive_material . Other people might see your edit as censorship. [WP:CENS] If you have a valid policy reason to remove the content, please quote the relevant policy and reedit..Tags: TwinkleUndo