15:0615:06, 9 February 2016diffhist+1,468
Mikael Ljungman
Patent applications can't be a self promoting material. WP:SELFPUB accepted if the article is not based primarily on such sources.
15:0315:03, 9 February 2016diffhist+1,537
Mikael Ljungman
Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone.
19:1319:13, 8 February 2016diffhist+241
Mikael Ljungman
Present to past. Patent application could not be consider poorly sourced or trivia. The article about IS is not related to the content from youtube. Its related to political activity. He is also political active thru social media. Supportive sources is OK
13:4513:45, 8 February 2016diffhist+1,367
Mikael Ljungman
Patent application is not trivia or poorly sourced. Its related to the biographical person, his relations to tech companies.
07:2607:26, 8 February 2016diffhist+4,745
Mikael Ljungman
Try to reach consensus on Talk. If grammatical errors edit. What is poorly sourced? Political activity and contributions? Patent applications? Supportive sources to political activity?
19:3619:36, 6 February 2016diffhist+4,745
Mikael Ljungman
Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research.
18:1918:19, 6 February 2016diffhist+4,600
Mikael Ljungman
Patent applications reliable source and also edited by other authors. Convictions in summary. Political activity and contributions are of interest and supported by several sources. Education supported by several sources.