21:5721:57, 6 September 2016diffhist+9 m
Women's World Championship (WWE)
What you've pointed out in your summary is 100% irrelevant to this argument. You continuously ignore policy and edit at your own discretion, a vandalism report is now being filed.
21:5621:56, 6 September 2016diffhist+43 m
WWE Women's Championship
I literally pointed out a minute ago that the aforementioned discussion is for the page TITLE, not the page CONTENT. This is standard policy and your editing must be very reckless if you're undoing edits without reading summaries.
21:4921:49, 6 September 2016diffhist+43
WWE Women's Championship
No the jury isn't out on this, it's standard WikiPedia policy and has been such for many years. Also if something is a "Fact" it is never up for discussion....that's what makes it a fact, therefore your whole "jury" metaphor does not apply here.
21:3821:38, 6 September 2016diffhist+43 m
WWE Women's Championship
Though we chose to include "WWE" in the title, it doesn't change the fact it isn't the official title. Official title MUST be reflected throughout the page regardless of title according to WP policy.
21:3621:36, 6 September 2016diffhist+5 m
WWE Intercontinental Championship
Though we chose to include "WWE" in the title, it doesn't change the fact it isn't the official title. Official title MUST be reflected throughout the page regardless of title according to WP policy.
21:3321:33, 6 September 2016diffhist−20 m
WWE United States Championship
Though we chose to include "WWE" in the title, it doesn't change the fact it isn't the official title. Official title MUST be reflected throughout the page regardless of title according to WP policy.