GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NapHit (talk · contribs) 23:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • I originally intended to include a post-match section, but felt it would be irrelevant to go at length about both clubs reaching another final when it had little to do with their Super Cup performances. There wouldn't be much quotes/talking points because this cup doesn't determine a club's season; the way it was scheduled back then it was almost treated as an escapism from (the dregs of) domestic football. Plus the other problem I had was including Graham's sacking; it came after the match, so logically it could be included in a below section. But I decided to include a footnote so the article wouldn't deviate. Had Graham got sacked because of the Super Cup, perhaps then I could justify a post-match section.

Overall, a very good article. Will put on hold till these issues are dealt wth. NapHit (talk) 23:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ta for taking a look at this NapHit. Answered your queries and will get to expanding the match summaries some time later today (can't find any Italian reports, but there are plenty of English ones). Lemonade51 (talk) 01:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@NapHit: I've now added a bit more detail to both match reports with what sources I can find. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant! I'll pass the article now, kudos on some great work! NapHit (talk) 00:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]