GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 17:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

A bunch of copy improvements, especially when it comes to commas. There are a few places where I question whether the inclusion of some details is salient or just cruft. It's been a while, so fresh eyes might see more things to do. Ping me when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 18:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Route to the final

[edit]

Pre-match

[edit]

Match

[edit]

Post-match

[edit]

Sourcing and spot checks

[edit]

No copyvio issues. Note that I do need to run pages through a translator for the Dutch-language sourcing.

Images

[edit]

There are two images, one of De Kuip and another of Groningen fans. Both appear to be appropriately licensed. The second image has alt text.

I handled the Nijland stuff by making a better introduction to indicate that there were players with ties to both organizations. Will pass. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 20:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.