GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 23:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will take this up. I was planning on doing Aberdeenshire, but it's taken. (My comments there: your sentences lack punctuation that would be very useful in parsing longer sentences.)

Not many questions. One ref needs a link fixed. Some grammar fixes and a question about a section that has no inline citations associated with it. Ping me when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 00:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Results

[edit]

Sourcing and spot checks

[edit]

I spot checked some of the numbers in the figures instead of specific references, including:

I also checked

The Ref 17 issue should be an easy fix.

Images

[edit]

There is an OGL image of one councillor and a PD-simple composition map.

@Stevie fae Scotland Added the LEAP ref to make the 2017 composition sourced, but that other ref does satisfy my concerns. And ref 17 now checks out. Will pass. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 17:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.