This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Not a lot of stuff, just kind of a clean up if u will. If you notice anything wrong with the page, let me know.
RaikiriChidori (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Looks almost like a perfect photocopy out of Where the Wild Things Are... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.150.112 (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
If you have any reliable sources as to a genre for what they are, please consult the musical style section. Place a genre and the reliable reference it matches with in that section. DO NOT ERASE. RaikiriChidori (talk)
And as a side note, think about their musical style this way:
•they have alt-metal-style song structures
•they use melodeath-style instruments (double-bass drums to incorporate blastbeats, for example)
•they utilize metalcore-style vocals
The album is leaked on torrent sites. I have verified it is real. I don't know what the format is for mentioning this or citation or anything so if someone wants to fix that up it would be good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh.oosterman (talk • contribs) 08:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Who the f*ck changed the genre to metalcore? in another albums like come clarity it is even understandable, but this one is influenced by old metal like iron maiden 189.26.86.137 (talk) 17:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I have changed genre to melodic metal,I dont see(hear) any reason as to why this album should be classified as MDM59.95.8.57 (talk) 18:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
This album is definately not melodeath, but neither is it "alternative metal" or "metalcore".--SilverOrion (talk) 08:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
This album is very similar to Clayman in all aspects, except perhaps it have a softer approach. So why don't leave just melodeath and hard rock Haxxiy (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
FOR THE LAST TIME, this album cant be considered melodeath. common heavy metal and alternative rock are the most fitting genres to it. 189.58.57.147 (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I know that maybe this is a little off the limb but what about progressive metal? You can tell they have some jazz influence and a solid approach on classic metal from Iron Maiden. I'm not saying on all their albums; I mean just their most recent one. And on the Iron Maiden-influenced note, why not thrash?
"The Chosen Pessimist" is surely prog-rock/metal. But I would not say the same about the other songs. Haxxiy (talk) 17:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Actually, listening to "Tilt" I'm tempted to think of them as melodic metalcore. What the vocalist is doing there isn't death growling, it's more of like....a cross between singing aggressively and growling, and just flat-out singing. That melodeath does not make. I'll be comparing this album to other melocore bands like "In this moment" to try to get a better idea if they are melocore or not. Zaruyache (talk) 22:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm so f'in sick of all the people out there that can't describe how In Flames sounds and then just go the safe way and say "melodic death metal". The only similarity with melodic death metal is well... Melodies. There is no death metal in there, and far too much modern alternative stuff going on. I know that legions of fans that know what they are talking about don't mean shit when it comes to wikipedia, because one single guy that have never heard of In Flames calls Come Clarity a thrash metal record... And then it surely is, right? Why don't we just call it "metal" and get over with it. Because calling it melodic death metal is just confusing and incorrect. And we want to be correct here at Wikipedia, right?--85.224.80.59 (talk) 10:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
In Flames founded melodic death metal, and therefore it seems that In Flames is not dependent on the nature of melodic death metal, but the nature of melodic death metal is dependent on In Flames. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.23.36 (talk) 01:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Just because they inveted melodeath doesn't mean they still are melodeath. Sure, they created it, but they definitely don't still play it. They've progressed into a more alternative sound, incorporating traits of metalcore, alternative metal, and even still melodic death metal, buth they don't play melodeath exclusively any more. Zaruyache (talk) 02:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
But the first 4 or 5 tracks sound just like melodeath on "Reroute to Remain", they're just not the conventional '90s sytle. The drums and bass are, but the vocals do have a bit of metalcore. A lot of alternative though. Would it be okay to put metalcore, alternative metal, and melodeath up there? 'The Chosen Pessimist' is defintely prog, so we can't put all four up there. Yes, it's not exclusively melodeath, but still enough to label the album as melodeath. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalKommandant (talk • contribs) 00:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, leaving it as "heavy metal" would be more worse than leaving melodeath, alternative metal (hell, even metalcore). This album is mainly alternative metal vocally, but the instrumentals are still melodeath. It should just be melodic death metal, alternative metal, and progressive metal. What's wrong with that? It describes the album very affluently. I see influence of metalcore, but it's not a genre of this album. -MetalKommandant (talk) 18:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I prefer to call this album "Melodic Metalcore", since there is no death metal in there, just a few growls. My opinion:) --Count Zar (talk) 18:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Cool story, bro. =) -MetalKommandant (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
U wellkomm:)Count Zar (talk) 22:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Of course it has nothing to do with melodic deathmetal, no matter how you lay it out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.33.246.216 (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
I've removed all unreliable professional reviews according to WP:ALBUM. Please feel free to add reliable professional reviews according to the list in the article. Haxxiy (talk) 16:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on A Sense of Purpose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=105470((dead link))
tag to http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/Blabbermouth.net/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=115499When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on A Sense of Purpose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on A Sense of Purpose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.inflamesdiscography.com/asenseofpurpose.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on A Sense of Purpose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)