After Laughter has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 29, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rock music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:After Laughter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Realmaxxver (talk · contribs) 12:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding comments soon. Realmaxxver (talk) 12:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, are you going to review this, @Realmaxxver:? It's been nearly a month now. MoonJet (talk) 04:41, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• okay. Realmaxxver (talk) 12:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you. Please do this as soon as you can. MoonJet (talk) 09:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• "After Laughter represents a complete departure from the usual pop punk and alternative rock sound of their previous releases. The album touches on themes of exhaustion, depression and anxiety, in direct contrast to the upbeat and vibrant sound of the record." → "After Laughter represents a complete departure from the usual pop punk and alternative rock sound of their previous releases, while touching on themes of exhaustion, depression and anxiety, in direct contrast to the upbeat and vibrant sound of the record."
• ""Forgiveness" is a "dreamy power ballad" which features "sassy handclaps and hairflicks". It has been compared to pop rock bands Heart, Fleetwood Mac and Haim.[46][39]" → ""Forgiveness" is a "dreamy power ballad" which features "sassy handclaps and hairflicks", which has been compared to pop rock bands Heart, Fleetwood Mac and Haim.[46][39]"
• "According to NME, it is one of the album's nods to their punk past. They also compared it to No Doubt's earlier music.[46]" → "According to NME, it is one of the album's nods to their punk past, which they also compared to No Doubt's earlier music.[46]"

link

• wikidat is a mirror and fork, from what I can tell
• shorten down the quote in Society6 blog, AllMusic and maybe Paste magazine.

putting on hold for now. Realmaxxver (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the copy edit stuff. I'll check out the copyvio stuff later. MoonJet (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Realmaxxver: I've shortened the quotes from those first two sources. I don't think the Paste magazine quote needs to be shortened, as it only takes three sentences from the review. What do you mean about the Wikidat thing? I'm unfamiliar with this. Also, that link won't work for me. MoonJet (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·