GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 20 upper (talk · contribs) 12:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I'm not sure about this article, but give me some time and I'll have this nomination fully reviewed. 20 upper (talk) 12:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time! 🎄Cremastra 🎄 (talk) 13:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cremastra: Starting review now; sorry for the delay. 20 upper (talk) 17:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see the article failed GA a few months ago. Will take a look at the nomination. 20 upper (talk) 17:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia says "The tail is usually three-quarters the length of the body" That is too-close paraphrasing

Wikipedia says "have been extirpated in the early 20th century." Again, the paraphrasing is too close

Wikipedia says "They are known to be strict carnivores, as opposed to other civets, which are usually omnivorous." Too-close once again

Wikipedia says "According to one analysis, worms and orthopterans made up 80% of the civets' diet across twelve samples, the remainder being composed of other invertebrates." Too-close once again

I've seen enough, and I'm failing this article.

Review against criteria

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.