![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Really? Baywatch introduced this to American society? I kind of think it existed long before Baywatch came along. Is there any source for this?
Hey so everyone knows it is 1.1 million viewers each week, not 1.1 billion. The source says so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.155.194 (talk) 05:35, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I have to say this article is horrible and barely has any information in it. what the fuck is up with that?74.195.3.199 07:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
And I have to say it's OK as I came here looking for info on BAYWATCH and was delighted to find everything I would have ever wanted on this series. Everything is OK with this article. RokasT 19:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
There is no mention of David Hasselhoff being the singer of the theme song, I'll Be Ready and I'm pretty positive he was. Can someone find a source for that.Itsmeiam 07:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Jimmy Jamison sang the title song, not Hasselhoff. ZLMarshall (talk) 06:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
I've added some more details of theme songs, taken from the German DVDs. I believe these are the most faithful to the original broadcasts, but I could be wrong.--GavinRobinson (talk) 19:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
LOL I'll be ready is sung by Jim Jamison who was part of the group Survivor. It is not sung by Hasselhoff. 2600:1700:4260:35D0:703F:943C:C73C:300A (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Image:HawaiianWeddingBay.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
It's important use the image of Baywatch Wedding in this article, because it refers the last movie connected with the famous series of Baywatch.84.90.89.43 22:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Some one (not me, because I really don't know anything about it) should write a section about Baywatch in popular culture. Just my two cents! DangerousNerd talk 00:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:BayWS2DVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
The link mentions "a source," not that she was officially cast as the article suggests. Also, it seems odd that she would be "officially cast" six years prior to the script being written - the article (correctly, as far as I know) notes that the current rumors are that Garelick is rewritting the script. I've heard that as well, but can't find the source any more. ZLMarshall (talk) 06:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Baywatch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Baywatch's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "BOM":
((cite web))
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |website=
(help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
"Dark Side of the 90's" takes a look at the significance Baywatch" had on '90's culture. The episode talks about the following:
Not in the episode, but still should be noted based on impact.
If you actually watched the episode, you'd know all of the first three points. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 04:12, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Good day. I see that my addition for the theme song for Baywatch is being rejected for odd reasons https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baywatch&diff=1143234350&oldid=1143228720. I literally used the same sources from the first paragraph of I'm Always Here to state the same thing.
Aren't IMDB and news articles reliable sources per wikipedia? If not, the I'm Always Here article needs to have those sources removed. If I remove those, I think editors will revert me for removing sourced content. Do you see my dilemma? On one article those sources are ok, in this article, apparently they are not.
It is a major hole in the article to not mention the popular theme to Baywatch which ran after 1991. The news source mentioned this there too. See here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilAJJ3WHg6g and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0nqwgu_Us4&t=6s. It is part of the Baywatch soundtrack also. Can you help update the article? 65.223.10.226 (talk) 17:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
The lifeguard and actor Michael Newman (credited as playing himself) is linked to the wrong Wikipedia entry. Michael J. Newman is a judge from the MidWest. Unfortunately a verifiable profile to the real person doesn’t exist on Wikipedia, so I’m going to simply remove the live link. Denstat (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)