Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sohom Datta (talk · contribs) 15:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 16:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I will be reviewing this article, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Good luck to the editors! Arconning (talk · contribs)
  • @Sohom Datta: I believe this are all the comments that need to be addressed, good luck! Arconning (talk · contribs)

Prose and MoS[edit]

Lede[edit]

• Change to 95/94 years ago in infobox as the year makes it ambiguous.

 Done Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Integrate ambassadors to Marketing.

 Not done, the ambassadors are from an interview with a Boroline officials and there isn't a lot of context/RS coverage outside of this specific interview of the individuals working for Boroline Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• is recognized for its enduring legacy across generations., informal. Maybe change unless supported by a source?

Replaced Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

• symbolizing strength and prosperity and inspired, add comma after prosperity.

 Done Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing[edit]

• During the early 1900s, it was considered a matter of pride to be using the locally made Boroline over other similar foreign creams., considering the product was made in the 1920s, the decade should be made closer to when Boroline was considered as such.

 Done Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• During this time, the company was run by..., what time?

1950, added Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• haatiwala cream, put the literal translation of haatiwala.

Added Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Product[edit]

• Boroline continues to be available to consumers,, put an As of date format to maintain encyclopedic tone.

Done Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In popular culture[edit]

• known to evoke a sense, replace known with said.

Done Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refs[edit]

• Capitalize mint.

 Done Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ref 9 doesn't seem reliable due to the nature of its website focusing on health claims. Hopefully change and omit the source.

 Done Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spotchecks[edit]

• Spotchecks, manual and earwig show nothing. Pass.

Images[edit]

• Image is relevant and have proper licensing. Considering the products age, copyright free images of the founder or the product itself in its early stages could be used due to copyright laws. :)

I'll go through and see if I can find a properly dated advertisement of the product. Sohom (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misc.[edit]

• No ongoing edit war, focused on the topic, broad information, no bias.

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed