GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Lead
 Done by Mr. Boo
 Done by Mr. Boo
 Done
History
  • Change to: "led the participating ice hockey arena owners to introduce the new sport." Does this make more sense? -Mitico
 Done by Mr. Boo
 Done There are some the believe that the Mann Cup was only changed to box lacrosse rules after Mann's death because he opposed the box version of the game. I was attempting to allude to this, while remaining on the encyclopedic/no original research side of things. It's not that pertinent, so I'll strike it. It will also shorten this long sentence. -Mitico.
 Done by Mr. Boo
 Done by Mr. Boo, with further explanation below.
Players
  • Changed "On the floor," to "During play,"
  • Explained/expanded the term "runner"
Is it clearer now? - Mitico
 Done
Goalkeeper
  • Reworded & specific dimensions added. Too much?
 Done Stricken. I could not find one, outside references that say that wooden sticks are allowed in CLA leagues. I left it in, because the image showed a goaltender with a wooden stick. Since wooden sticks are allowed, and mentioned somewhere else in the article, this might be duplicate, and unnecessary. - Mitico.
 Done by Mr. Boo. Removed comment. The comment was related to the Philly Box Lacrosse "faq" page, but honestly didn't add much so removal is okay by me. -Mitico
Playing area
  • I have gone with your suggestion, however I put the level two "Rules" above "Players, equipment and officials." I was little concerned that having level four's would be too many, and would be a negative point in review. Let me know if you think I should change it. - Mitico.
Duration
 Done
International
 Done - Change to "Box lacrosse is the most popular version of the sport in the Czech..." Which is reflected in the source. - Mitico.

Quite a bit to do, but nothing individually too demanding, so I'll put it on hold. Peanut4 (talk) 21:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review and the constructive comments. There are certainly some areas of the article that can be improved and terms that should be further explained. In terms of the NLL, the word "current" is used a number of times for two reasons: (1) back in the 70's, there was a league called the National Lacrosse League, that was unrelated to the one that exists now, and (2) the number and location of teams frequently changes in the NLL -- there haven't been two consecutive seasons with exactly the same teams since the early 90's -- so when we say, for example, "the thirteen teams in the NLL", we are assuming that that number will change within a year. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 01:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Peanut, again, thanks for the review and help in improving this article. I think we have addressed all of your concerns. For the items that I feel strongly that they are resolved, I put a  Done mark underneath of them. For others in which I have comments or maybe more questions you will not see this designation. Please let me know if you have any questions. Any further comments, concerns and observations welcome. Thanks! mitico (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All looks very good. Great work. My one final question is do you need to credit the photographer in the lead image? After all, we don't sign any text, and his copyright details are available at the image page. Peanut4 (talk) 22:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess not. It has just always been that way so I didn't think about changing it. I have removed. Thanks, mitico (talk) 23:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Excellent work. It meets all the GA criteria.

I'm not sure what your plans are to progress the article, but my advice would be to look at some featured articles of other sports, to see if there's anything you could add; taking a quick look association football is an obvious one to look at, but also chariot racing, hare coursing, though I'm not sure what help those two will be. However it may also be worth looking at other related sports or GA sport articles for any ideas. Other than that perhaps get a peer review for any suggestions or help to turn the prose towards FA-worthy prose.

On an aside note, thanks for your own part during the GA process. You've both been a pleasure to work with. Peanut4 (talk) 23:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]