Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jack Frost (talk) 01:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Drmies (talk). Self-nominated at 20:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • New article is 4,251 characters long and nominated on the same day as its creation. No copyvios detected and no close paraphrasing issues spotted (AGF scanned refs which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 129 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 2 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source (accessed and read behind JSTOR paywall). QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Breton Ballads/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) 17:32, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


The only possible "issue" someone could imagine is the Quote of Linda Gowans, in a review for the "Jahrbuch für Volksliedforschung", I guess the quote was in german (was not able to fetch it) (?) per mos:foreignquote. Everything else looks fine.