Good articleBrooks Robinson has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 1, 2021Good article nomineeListed
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 27, 2023.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brooks Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuit outcome?[edit]

What was the outcome from the 2014 lawsuit? Source? Gprobins (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brooks Robinson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 04:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there - I'll be reviewing this article over the coming days. I'll leave comments below, separated by section, and then present an overall assessment once those have been taken care of. Thanks! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have left comments below. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Early life

Baltimore Orioles

Early years (1955-1959)

Everyday player, MVP (1960-1965)

World Series champion (1966-1971)

Later years (1972-1977)

Career statistics

Player profile

Off-the-field occupations

Honors

Personal life

Other

Overall assessment

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

All of my concerns have been met, article looks good. Happy to pass. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]