GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 17:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZKang123 Here are my comments! Hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Arconning: Responded.--ZKang123 (talk) 00:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ZKang123 Just one more issue, the title of the artwork is "Water, Nature & Contemporary". The lead says "Water, Nature and the Contemporary" Arconning (talk) 06:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed.--ZKang123 (talk) 06:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

[edit]

Lead and infobox

[edit]

Constructions

[edit]

Delay in opening

[edit]

White elephant incidents and station opening

[edit]

Details

[edit]

Artwork

[edit]

Images

[edit]

Refs

[edit]

Misc

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.