This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Galicia Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Galicia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Galicia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaliciaWikipedia:WikiProject GaliciaTemplate:WikiProject GaliciaGalicia articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Archaeology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Spain Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: edit history watch purge Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Edit this list

I think translation should be Castro Culture...

Check yahoo; many more relevant results when searching for "Castrexo culture" than for "Castro culture".Dannycas 20:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true; there are 15 results for "Castrexo culture" and 409 for "Castro Culture". Visitor 23:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

I think it's should be Castro Culture, too. This appears to be the preferred term in scientific publications (for example, here [1], here [2] and here [3]. Besides, "castrexo" is a galician word, and the Castro Culture area is bigger than galician language area. It covers Portugal (if you consider galician and portuguese as two different languages; if you don't, it should be Castrejo Culture with portuguese ortography), as it can be seen here [4], and Asturias, not only its galician-language area, but even its asturian-language one (again [5]), where it should be "Cultura Castreña". Searching for "Castrexo Culture" in Google, it only appears in Wikipedia itself, in one post made by a galician user and in a celtist galician page (probably because of a bad translation from galician language), and none of those is a scientific example. I'm going to made a "Castro Culture" redirect page, but I think it should be the principal page and "Castrexo Culture" the redirect one. Finally, spanish translation is not "Cultura Castreja", and "Cultura Castreña", but this I'm going to change it immediatly. Guestia 15:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I've changed to Castro culture and added a nice picture that was on Portuguese wikipedia. You can print it and put it on your wall, so pretty! -Pedro 20:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The bulding in the picture is a reconstruction, I presume. The article should make this clear. FilipeS 20:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• OBVIOUSLY, do you really think the roof would survive 2000 or 3000 yrs?! ---Pedro 01:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Anyway FilipeS has a point. It's better to make it clear --Ravenloft 10:19, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppidum is a beautiful word, but doesnt feel right for this region, read books about this and that word does not come up for this region and, most importantly places that are known as "cividade" originally should be in the article known as such. this name like castro is of historical value and used by the common people. The article is unbalanced too. It gives to much focus on Galicia, while most of the sites and major sites are in Northern Portugal, although South Galicia has relevant sites too and we see nice sculptures in the article, that are of course very relevant. --Pedro (talk) 13:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Oppidum, and its plural oppida, was a common Latin denomination for the larges settlements in the area -it was used at least by Pomponius Mela (Chorographia, III.9) and Pliny(NH IV.111-112) to refer to major local settlements, including Braga-, and it is also used in international bibliography as a reference to major semi-urban "castros" (see for example Iron Age Archaeology of the Northwest Iberian Peninsula, by César Parcero Oubiña and Isabel Cobas Fernández, and A Round Iron Age: The Circular House in the Hillforts of the Northwestern Iberian Peninsula by Xurxo M. Ayán Vila, both articles in e-Keltoi (6): http://www4.uwm.edu/celtic/ekeltoi/volumes/vol6/index.html). It's true that these same places are called by the locals castro's, crasto's, cividade's, cidade's, cibdá's, cidá's... On reference to the balance, well, it surely can be improved, but it's simply not true that most sites are in Portugal: in Galicia alone there are tens of major castro's -oppida or cividades, whatever- and thousands of minor -even tiny- hill-forts and cliff-forts belonging tho the Castro culture, all along the country, but in contrast with the Gallaecia Bracarense -southern Galicia and northern Portugal- most northern Galician castros are very small (0,5-2 ha in surface), so maintaining the aspect of the smaller and older castros of the South, before the development of major cividades in the 3rd-2nd century BCE. Anyway, here modern frontiers -fought back in the XII-XVth centuries among people who spoke and wrote the same language, and BTW I speak my western Galici an with my northern Portuguese neighbors who speak northern Portuguese and we come together rather well- don't follow older ones. Regards.--Froaringus (talk) 19:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hello. Thanks for your input. Very interesting then. Braga does not show up in the archaeological surveys that I've read. if oppida is used I'm pretty much ok with it then. Although the term "cividade" showed be used on those that have been used historically. I know it just means city. I wasn't stating an opinion of my own, but something I've read from the book Cultura Castreja no Norte de Portugal which is pretty much the Portuguese bible on this. That occurs in Portugal too, from the Douro down and Trás-os-Montes which has less sites. The article is great though, can get a lot better, but with a lot of interesting pics, needs more info! I know an American university was doing relevant survays in Cividade de Bagunte sometime ago, it would be interesting to know what they found out.

subjects to develop:

• religion: dieties and religious practices.
• more on pottery and other kinds of art, especially statues and inscriptions.
• what the Romans and other peoples said about them. --Pedro (talk) 21:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Pedro. I totally agree: religion, pottery, Roman and Greek testimonies are still largely lacking... I would really love to improve the article on these and other subjects. On Braga, it is called Bracarum oppidum Augusta by Pliny, although that probably did not imply a pre-Roman foundation:

"deinde conventus Lucensis a flumine Navia Albiones, Cibarci, Egi, Varri cognomine Namarini, Adovi, Arroni, Arrotrebae. promunturium Celticum, amnes Florius, Nelo. Celtici cognomine Neri et super Tamarci, quorum in paeninsula tres arae Sestianae Augusto dicatae, Copori, oppidum Noeta, Celtici cognomine Praestamarci, Cileni. ex insulis nominandae Corticata et Aunios.

a Cilenis conventus Bracarum Helleni, Grovi, castellum Tyde, Graecorum subolis omnia. insulae Siccae, oppidum Abobrica. Minius amnis, IIII ore spatiosus, Leuni, Surbi, Bracarum oppidum Augusta, quos super Gallaecia. flumen Limia, Durius amnis e maximis Hispaniae, ortus in Pelendonibus et iuxta Numantiam lapsus, dein per Arevacos Vaccaeosque, disterminatis ab Asturia Vettonibus, a Lusitania Gallaecis, ibi quoque Turdulos a Bracaris arcens. omnis, quae dicta regio a Pyrenaeo, metallis referta auri, argenti, ferri, plumbi nigri albique."

Regards.--Froaringus (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Check my edits on religion. The actual names of the towns would be great. Pomponius Mela named some. Great stuff I found from a Spanish source from the Univerity of Alicante. Spanish sources are often great in these very ancient stuff. And the puzzle starts to make sense! Roman Mars / Native Cosus are the deities on the coast, of course not only the immediate coast, but also inland areas as far as Sanfins and a very large region in Galicia.

Braga was just selected to be the Capital of Gallaecia by the Romans and that could be for no special important reason, maybe just because of its central position.

In Lisbon there is a lot of archaeological finds in an archeology museum, some can be from the Castro region. Of course local museums can have great stuff too.

the article already has a lot of inscriptions, it lacks pottery and depictions or estele dedicated to gods, especially Cosus. ---Pedro (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Pedro. Nice pottery pic! Yes, the pottery section really needs additions. On the deities, are you using "Los dioses de la hispania celtica" by Olivares Pedreño? Great. I'm looking on adding something on ancient authors testimonies, anthroponymy, and onomastics, but since I'm rather busy right now I'll need my time. Cheers.--Froaringus (talk) 19:34, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes that's the author. Another thing: I'm sorry, but the article is again a total mess. You must have a big screen or a very high resolution. The article is intended to be comfortably read by most people, not a warehouse. --Pedro (talk) 20:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the torc doesn't look special or appealing. It fits the article on celtic cultural influence and on the reasons for Roman conquest. I would prefer the helmet or the Gallaecian head. IMO, both look much better and much more interesting. --Pedro (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a good copyedit. Is it castro, castro or Castro? Rothorpe (talk) 12:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Castro culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303170341/https://www.qdrive.net/download/sharelinkdownloader.php?id=42532&key=8Xx2OxX9EXX9KpB58bP9OmX5MjLXKdJ1InH to https://www.qdrive.net/download/sharelinkdownloader.php?id=42532&key=8Xx2OxX9EXX9KpB58bP9OmX5MjLXKdJ1InH

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]