Lead & Plot: First mention of each character needs the actor name in brackets afterwards. It's already been done for the guests, but needs to be done for the mains.
Critical response: "especially strong installment, which delivered on a lot of fronts." - needs a citation to directly follow it.
References: Ref 3 needs an access date. Ref 10 is linking to the site's generic front page. However, is it possible to replace it with a similar reference to 11? That way it easily avoids any issues with 10 being a blog.
I'll give the article another look through once those points are covered.
Regards the Bryce Larkin point, I would say that only if the actor appeared would they need to follow the character's name in brackets. Miyagawa(talk)15:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Only one remaining point - in cultural references, "a light-hearted Dog Day Afternoon parody." needs to have a citation directly following it. Miyagawa(talk)12:57, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. So every train of thought needs citation, even when the following sentences are supported by the same source? --Boycool (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to grade this one as a GA now. Good job on the overall improvements, and especially on the changes since the first GA review. It's great to see a Chuck episode meeting the grade, and I hope this won't be the last. :) Well done. Miyagawa(talk)