GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Note to reviewers: This article was written as part of PLoS Computational Biology's new Topic Page feature. The article was drafted on the PLoS topic page wiki, then peer reviewed and published on PLoS Comp Biol. Whilst I've nominated this article in its own right, I'd also appreciate any feedback as to how these Topic Pages can be closer aligned with WP guidelines.

Reviewer: Sasata (talk · contribs) 05:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Will need a few days to read carefully (and juggle other things). Sasata (talk) 05:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments. Here's are some comments from a quick readthrough. I'll do a literature check and check compliance with criteria 2 and 3 soon. Sasata (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. I'll get to work on your suggestions. U+003F? 08:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I went with the specific, undeveloped link U+003F? 09:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I think this is a little better. U+003F? 17:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's a little short. How about adding the following to achieve a more complete summary:
  • the first circularly permuted protein was concanavalin A
  • the two main models proposed to explain the origin of these proteins
  • a sentence or two summary of the uses of circ perm in protein engineering
  • a sentence or two summary about the types of algorithms used for detection. Sasata (talk) 07:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Excellent suggestions. Any better? U+003F? 15:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Couldn't find a ref for the second half of this statement – removed. U+003F? 14:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 10:03, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 09:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 10:22, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Make more sense? U+003F? 14:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I pulled this sentence (but kept the reference). U+003F? 14:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 09:27, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 14:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 12:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done U+003F? 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • journal titles should be in title case consistently (and please fix the ALL CAPS in Cheltsov 2001)
 Done U+003F? 10:01, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • similarly, journal article titles should be consistently in either title or sentence case (the latter is more usual)
 Done U+003F? 10:01, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • 3.0-A -> 3.0-Å
 Done U+003F? 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Correct folding of circularly permuted variants of a beta alpha barrel enzyme in vivo" -> "... of a βα barrel ..."
 Done U+003F? 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Qian 2005 needs the species name italicized
 Done U+003F? 08:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Beernink et al. 2001, change alpha to α
 Done U+003F?

Thanks again. I've had a first pass at dealing with your comments and suggestions. Let me know what you think. U+003F? 17:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've had a look at the recent literature in this topic and am confident that the article meets the criteria 3a ("addresses the main aspects of the topic") and 3b ("stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail"). I've also verified several of the statements in the article and think the article complies with criteria 2a, b, and c. The images all have Wikipedia-compatible licenses. I'll be happy to promote to GA once the last issue with the lead is addressed. Sasata (talk) 07:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, all of my concerns have been resolved satisfactorily, and I am confident that the article meets the GA criteria. Good working with you, and I hope to see more of these computational biology topic pages here at GAN! Sasata (talk) 03:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
More