This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article needs expanding....

'In Britain, the proposals for co-determination were drawn up, and a command paper produced named the Bullock Report. This was done in 1977 by the Harold Wilson Labour Party (UK) government.'

This is completely wrong. Harold Wilson was not the Labour Party Leader in 1977, Jim Callaghan was.

How can somebody know about the Bullock Report, yet fail to know who was Prime Minister in 1977?

Bloody idiot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.74.96 (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dr. Brown has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

This seems a fair account of an issue now changed in nature

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Brown has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

• Reference : S Oxenbridge & S Deakin & W Brown & C Pratten, 2001. "Collective Employee Representation and the Impact of Law: Initial Response to the Employment Relations Act 1999," ESRC Centre for Business Research - Working Papers wp206, ESRC Centre for Business Research.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 13:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Codetermination seems most popular here. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agree, and even the lede uses codetermination without the hyphen. lizthegrey (talk) 00:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nearly identical subject matter; the BLER article has a much more comprehensive formulated table of regulations by country that is written out in prose here but for many fewer countries. lizthegrey (talk) 00:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Where we would want to eventually be would be a summary list BLER practices/laws by country and an article with an overview of BLER practices/laws. We have the bones of that structure. The BLER article would appear to be an appropriate list article, the history section could be moved here and the article renamed to reflect list status. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]