This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Covenant in Mormonism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
I've been a member for 36 years and have never heard it explained that there are informal and formal covenants. Is there a reference for this that could be added? I see that there is some usefulness in classifying them this way, but I also think it might imply that formal covenants are somehow considered more binding than the "informal" ones, which I feel is misleading. --Will (talk) 06:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
JonasRichards (talk) 23:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)I've never heard of it being bad to have "much laughter" on the sabbath. I'm pretty sure that's wrong.JonasRichards (talk) 23:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Clearly, there are some issues with this article. The formal/informal distinction, as noted above, is problematic and not supported by sources.
I think one of the problems is that the word "covenant" seems to be used in two different ways within Mormonism. The first way is that it refers to the promise between God and a person that is made in association with an ordinance.
The second way that it is used is more general. The idea is that people can make promises to God to keep commandments, and then God promises blessings in return. This is outside of any connection to an ordinance. Is this properly referred to as a "covenant" in Mormonism? It can be, in the sense that it makes up part of the "new and everlasting covenant" or the "covenant people" nature of followers of Christ. But how exactly to tackle this issue in the article I'm unsure of. Perhaps including any discussion of the latter type is too esoteric or bound to be misunderstood. Good Ol’factory (talk) 07:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
I made some changes that I believe clarify the issue of "formal vs informal" distinction that you have ( erroneously, in my opinion) tried to make. Nonmembers are not expected to obey the word of wisdom or to pay tithing. They have not made a covenant to do so. Members of the church have made a covenant to obey the commandments. This coven is made through the ordinance of baptism. Therefore these covenants are associated with the ordinance of baptism. It may not seem like it. And maybe it's not talked about in such a direct manner, but there's no other way that it can be. KeithDay (talk) 19:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)