GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Shall give this a go... ♦ jaguar 21:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I must fail this GAN due to the incessant amount of broken English and unencyclopaedic language it contains, particularly in the development and reception sections. I am also concerned that the bulk of the development section derives from a copy and paste job. Please renominate this once it's cleaned up. jaguar 11:19, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I shall make suitable changes and give it a copyedit and renominate. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 12:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to reply to each part of the above to confirm with myself that I have covered them. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]