GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 23:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Should have this to you within 48 hours Jaguar 23:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

[edit]

References

[edit]

On hold

[edit]

A very good article, this appears to be pure GA material, hence the review feeling a little short. It is mostly well written, comprehensive and the references are in working order. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days until everything can be addressed. Jaguar 14:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Jaguar! I've gone through and fixed most of your concerns:
  • I would also like to have an image in the lead, but I can't think of any that would be suitable. Only a couple of the other development articles have images in the lead, but I'm not sure if one will work here. Let me know.
  • I felt that published would be better, since Rockstar Games is the publisher. However, I'll change it if you wish.
  • I've added a list of other developers in a footnote.
  • I believe the beginning of development (2005) is mentioned in the first sentence of the lead.
  • Clarified that the locations are fictional.
  • The original quote was written as "there are countryside environments", but here it's used as the opening of a sentence, requiring an upper case letter; as far as I'm aware, I can't alter the original quote without brackets.
  • Removed "set in the Old West".
If you have any further concerns, please don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks! -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 20:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response, Rhain, I think that after the changes you have made the article now meets the GA criteria. It was well written to start off with, but passing now Jaguar 21:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 21:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]