This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
In hope of maybe reviving the discussion about a re-edit of the Drupal page, I just wanted to point out one little detail, that for me is what makes Drupal different from any CMS I've ever used:
It doens't have a backend. As an administrator you lon in from the same location your other users login and you see the same page as your users (except for the admin menu). Now this is not necessarily a good thing (as can be seen in the Minnesota Usability research, that is mentioned in the article) but it is unique, as far as I know.
Maybe there could be some discussion about how to structure the site, what information to place where, etc.
I, for example, find the links in the above comment very useful, but I am unsure whether, if you included them in the article, you would have to include so many other sites that are similar, that it would simply be too much. That's just my two cents, though.
84.61.238.254 (talk) 00:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
There were an awful lot of unnecessary quotation marks—around even common terms, like "stock" and "back-end". I weeded them out, as they were excessive and superfluous, and undermined the significance of those that were actually warranted—i.e. around things that are actual quotations.
überRegenbogen (talk) 06:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)