GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bilorv (talk · contribs) 19:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Interesting topic; I'm not a soap watcher so hopefully I can give a useful outsider perspective on whether the article is understandable. Some initial comments:
... as a response to the protest movement arising from the murder of George Floyd. I'm surprised Black Lives Matter is not mentioned in the article—do no sources reference it?
... he reveals that Walter is the reason for his exit and explained that Walter demanded that he left Martine– Would we lose any information if this was just
... he explains that Walter demanded that he leave Martine? — Bilorv (talk) 17:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Nitpicks:
... and became the first British soap opera to do so– Not convinced by the grammar here (it implies that "the episode" became "the first British soap to do so"). How about
The episode was produced, written and directed by Black creatives—the first of a kind for a British soap opera?
The episode was first broadcast as a first-look– Repetition of "first" could be averted by substituting "was first broadcast" for "premiered".
it was announced by the soap that production on the episode– Active voice is briefer: "the soap announced that production on the episode ..."
... music of Black musicians were used for the score ...– Think it should be "... music ... was ...", or dropping the "music of" would sound fine to my ears.
Still the Production and Reception to properly look through, but maybe I'll hold off on that until the Metro issue is resolved. — Bilorv (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
The details of the day included Channel 4's flagship programming airing episodes starring and created by solely Black talent– A bit clunky. I would write it as: "For the day, Channel 4 aired a number of programmes starring and created by Black talent".
The purpose of the initiative was ...– This still has the murder of George Floyd link/framing that was improved in the lead.
as well as an exclusively Black production team– But The Guardian says, in a correction,
The special episode of Hollyoaks will be produced by a more diverse crew, but not an “all-black crew”, as an earlier version said. So it wasn't an "exclusively" Black production team, was it?
Grant, who portrays Brooke, opined that the clothing they wore in the episode marked their favourite costumes to date– This can surely be made much more concise. Something like "Grant, who portrays Brooke, commented that it was their favourite costuming to date."
All of the music featured in the episode had Black musicians, with the cast members featured in the episode being asked to give song suggestions for the soundtrack– Again concision. Just "All of the music featured in the episode had Black musicians, some suggested by cast members".
cantered around– Should this be "centred"?
that their opinions ...– Whose?
He felt that since Black people are commonly underrepresented in media– I can't see that either he or the source says this.
Griffin continued by telling Diva that the episode held significance due to being an episode created intentionally to showcase Black talent– Can be improved, as it's a bit wordy and repetitive.
untilmately– "ultimately".
the casting team cast Black cast members– Three "cast"s in seven words. Reword to avoid this.
Thompson-Dwyer voiced his excitement to reprise his role as Malique– The character's name is "Prince", isn't it?
stated that she felt comfortable on set– Implied by the "family" bit in the next sentence, and better dropped (it's hopefully not unusual to feel comfortable on set). I'd also drop the "joyous" quote as a bit excessive. It doesn't add much information, and we want to summarise the interview, not rewrite it.
"It's an honour to be part of history!"should use single quotes (' not ").
Blackwood felt that the episode was important represent the multicultural society of the UKhas a grammatical error.
These are my full comments, having considered the whole article now. Notice also a reply to a point above, and the BLM comment still pending. Thanks for your work so far! — Bilorv (talk) 17:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)