GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FREYWA 05:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo. Back from the GOCE's drive, I have this thing to review. FREYWA 05:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Particularly for this, the sections should have as few distinct paragraphs as possible. This thing needs cohesion.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Although that suffices, I would like a coverage of the compounds and precautions as in-depth as samarium.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    The only issue here is the captions: two of them are wrongly formatted. dendritic sublimated Eu handled in a glovebox (~300 g; purity 99.998%) and Europium sulfate, Eu2(SO4)3 (top), fluoresces red under ultraviolet light (bottom).
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Comments

[edit]

Issues

[edit]

2b

[edit]

1b

[edit]

1a

[edit]

 Done All done --Lanthanum-138 (talk) 07:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

6b

[edit]

 Done Lanthanum-138 (talk) 07:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]