Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Result: delisted MuZemike 16:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article has large portions of content which is unsourced or poorly sourced (note: I have added additional ((fact)), ((or)), and ((rs)) tags before this review to indicate content not backed by the next cited reliable source, original research, or user-generated unreliable sources.) It would not pass GA criterion #2. Also there seems to be undue weight on the Story section, which is too long and detailed compared to the rest of the content (goes against the MoS, failing criterion #1b). MuZemike 23:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• The story is a bit too detailed for the (lack of) complexity, though nothing drastic enough to really call it "undue weight"; a simple trim could free it up by 10-20 percent. As for the references, I agree with most of the tags. — Deckiller 01:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After a week and no substantial improvements to the article, I am delisting the article from GA status and reassessing as B-Class. Article can be renominated for GA after said improvements have been made. MuZemike 16:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]