This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I found that the source for the "History" section is from "The Atlantic". The article is not written by a professional in the field and therefore not a good source. I think we should scrap that whole section and make an actual history of gender advertisement. Currently I have left that part in a block quote. --The Unfit Donkey (talk) 03:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The references in the "Role Reversal" section are moved, I did find the place they were moved to, but the page said nothing that related to what the section said and it included erotic imagery. -- The Unfit Donkey (talk) 03:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
I suggest creating a redirect for the words "Gender Marketing" --The Unfit Donkey (talk) 03:43, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
It seems that the first paragraph (after the list) in the section Femininity in Advertising is promoting "The Girl Effect" campaign. The Unfit Donkey (talk) 03:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
From reading the article I think we should remove the editorial issue from the multiple issues for this page. The Unfit Donkey (talk) 03:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Problems I found with the citations on this pageThe Unfit Donkey (talk) 03:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)