General Electric Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 5, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from General Electric Building appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This page needs help with vocabulary. What does "generous masonry" actually mean? --Cantara 05:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I found a pair of images of the GE building that I didn't recognize as such, until some research.
Oh, if I only didn't lose the ability to transfer images to the commons. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 13:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on General Electric Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
@Beyond My Ken: could you explain your concern? You've reverted twice now without comment. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)