This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics of the United Kingdom Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.  ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. More information: /  This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government / Science and Academia Start‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage. This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

As of today^[update], the article claims that the change in the calendar was 'generally unpopular'. There is no evidence for this assertion and the article provides none. See Calendar (New Style) Act 1750#The calendar riot myth. Cite or delete. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]