This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||
|
If it broadcast from 7am to 9am, then the runtime should read 120 minutes, not 205 minutes. Softlavender (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Although in the very early stages at the moment, would it be best to keep the original TV-am format in one article and the new revived article in a new article? -- [[ axg // ✉ ]] 12:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Per WP:NAMB, we don't use hat notes when the title already disambiguate the pages. We don't add a hat note to Tree (set theory) indicating other kind of trees exist. According to Softlavender (talk · contribs) it is "a helpful hatnote that currently is the sole link between the two articles", the function of such hat notes is not that, that's the function of the page "Good Morning Britain (disambiguation)". The function of such notes is to disambiguate articles that arises confusion in its title, for example "Tree (set theory)", when Tree (descriptive set theory) also exists. According to Softlavender, just because Ego White Tray added the note "'This section is frequently disputed and should never be used as the sole reason to remove a hatnote" (because it has been in discussion), the note is clear: "as the sole reason". The real reason is that Good Morning Britain (disambiguation) and "(2014)/(1983)" are two reasons why the note is avoided, and should be excluded. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 22:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Both articles are very short, and, as said above, a continuation of the same brand. Have you discussed merging them? You can always split them in, say, 2016 if the article becomes unmanageably long. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Good Morning Britain (2014) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)