GA review

[edit]

WhisperToMe, you've done a great job so far with improving the article. I think it's a bit early to nominate for GA, but I've done the most thorough review that I can to help you further improve the article. I have placed the article on hold for one week to allow you and other editors to address the suggestions below. Not all are necessary for good article status, but the lead, article structure, broadness and prose quality need addressing to achieve GA.

Lead

#History

Geography

Demographics

Economy / Arts and culture / Sports and recreation

Government

Police service / Fire service

Education

Parks

Infrastructure

See also

References

External links

Good luck! :) Somno (talk) 09:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is coming along but there is still much work required to reach GA level, so I have failed the article. Work on expansion and avoiding one sentence paragraphs, and when these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Somno (talk) 08:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty - When I have time I'll try to expand the article WhisperToMe (talk) 01:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]