Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thehistorianisaac (talk · contribs) 09:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
New reviewer needed[edit]
The original review was reverted; a new reviewer is needed to start from scratch and do a complete review according to the GA criteria. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Simongraham and BlueMoonset: - I'll take a look at this. Hog Farm Talk 15:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. I look forward to your insights. simongraham (talk)
- "However, the German's recorded no loss" - I'm certainly no master of punctuation and am not quite confident to just remove it myself, but I don't think the apostrophe is warranted
- Good spot. I have amended this to remove the ambiguity.
- The Jutland artwork - if possible, I think it would be helpful to indicate in the caption if Maenad is the vessel partially seen in the foreground or the shadowy vessels in the background
- It seems to be the one on the foreground. Amended.
- Campbell isn't used, remove or move to further reading
- I have reread the relevant parts in Campbell and added some hopefully interesting facts.
I'll try to do some spotchecks later. Hog Farm Talk 16:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. In the interim, I believe that I have made the edits as suggested. simongraham (talk) 12:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- No issues from a spot-check perspective and the additions from Campbell look fine. Passing. Hog Farm Talk 03:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.