I'll be looking after this GA review. It looks pretty good I'm pretty sure it will pass. I'll leave a ping once I notice any issues.Tintor2 (talk) 21:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Per wp:lead I recommend expanding a bit the second paragraph at least with general information about the reception due to how much it covers. Just one sentence would be enough
Is the plot complete or the game was discontiued? It looks like it ended in a cliffhanger. Then again, I've no knowledge of the game. If that's how it ends I would add that "the narrative/game ends with"
Episodic release, but it's one of those things where they add bits and pieces all the time. I haven't played it for a while, so I don't know if there is a specific end point, nor if this is fully up to date Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs)22:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reference 8 further expands on the developer's intentions which seems quite useful to why all the actor are there.
The last paragraph from reception could use a contrasting introduction like. "Despite negative reviews, the game attracted awards"
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2.Verifiable with no original research:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
it contains no original research; and
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4.Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5.Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.