Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 02:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• GA1: Correct spelling and grammar throughout the article.
• GA2: A long list of good references.
• GA3: No unnecessary detail, good coverage in its aspects.
• GA4: Not so much applicable here, but still no bias throughout.
• GA5: Currently no content dispute or edit war in the article's history.
• GA6: Images correctly presented in the article, all relevant to the article's topic.

With a few more checks, this article could definitely be GA-status! Yay! :P. Numbermaniac - T- C 03:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can I help? Images? Synergee (talk) 06:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]