GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I think all the elements of a good article are here in I Dream of Jesus, but there is a good deal of work that has to be done before it's ready. I've made some comments below. I still have to take a more rigorous look at the sources, so the review is not done, but I've given you enough to address here that I'm going to wait to do the rest until you address these concerns. (Please also look over the changes I've made myself to the article and make sure you're OK with those changes.) Please address each item line-by-line and I'll strike them as we go... — Hunter Kahn 01:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Plot

Production and cultural references

Reception

The bird is the word is the same as surfing bird.--Pedro J. the rookie 21:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

I'm placing the article on hold for now. Once the above concerns are addressed, I'll continue my review... — Hunter Kahn 01:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me how it looks. --Pedro J. the rookie 02:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me what more is to do as i get confused . --Pedro J. the rookie 20:48, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Checklist

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Nice work! That's a pass! — Hunter Kahn 21:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]