Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the ((done)) tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Done I split these into four bundles, and expanded the citations within each bundle. It does mean some of the refs are duplicated, but it prevents people from going to the citation and then having to navigate to a different citation. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if anyone publicly accused them of "kidnapping" (using that specific word)—that's a word used in Wohl and Burkman's press release to describe Corrigan's accusations against them. Corrigan's public statement mostly talked about them taking her devices and her "bec[oming] powerless in a situation" (source). Let me know if you think there are clarifications that need to be made. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]