![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
When I saw that episode, what it sounded like to me was that Roan failed Casey so CASEY would have more time with his partner, not because Roan himself was attracted to her. Ambaryer (talk) 00:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
While the progression of rank WOULD be from Major to Lt. Colonel, they never actually said in "Chuck Versus the Colonel" whether he was promoted to Lt. Colonel or full Colonel. Ambaryer (talk) 12:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Note that in military parlance, though, lieutenant colonels are referred to as "colonel" conversationally, similar to how US Navy lieutenant commanders called "commander" in conversation. It's possible that Casey could have indeed been promoted correctly to lieutenant colonel (as opposed to jumping a paygrade to full colonel). --Clearlyhidden19 (talk) 00:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Why are people reading too much into this? It is not military proceedure to promote people two steps in rank. Casey HAS to be an Lt Colonel because the military would never make him full bird from a Major. that's standard military policy. Lt Colonel -> Colonel is not a simple step in rank like from Airman to Airmen first class, it's a major step up in the chain of command. - 15.195.201.87 (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Casey's branch of service is HEAVILY confused. In Chuck Versus the Helicopter he says he flew a B-2 Spirit, which belongs to the USAF. There are Marines in his SpecOps forces in Chuck Versus the Ring. Scenes of Casey's apartment shows US Army regalia among his belongings. The official site clouds this even further by ALSO saying he holds his rank from the US Army. The series itself never EXPLICITLY states what branch he's in. However the weight of evidence, including external sources, points to the US Army. Ambaryer (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Had to edit to remove that Chuck suggested a "populist tilt" by making his statement. It was obviously a self contradictory statement used to gain access to the buymore after the employees clearly stated he wasn't one of them. He had to act like a populist for a second for them to think he was one of them, but couldn't swallow that nasty pill without first taking the sweet sugar of making sure they understood he doesn't like pinko-liberal pansies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.167.145 (talk) 07:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't know if this has been mentioned before, but Casey's backstory in "Chuck Versus the Tic Tac" seems to contradict earlier episodes, such as his mother referring to him as "Johnny-boy" in "Chuck Versus Santa Claus" and John Casey's presence in the '80s as the Angel de la Muerte. --Boycool42 (talk) 20:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
I put in the ((Section OR)) template on the Awards section. It is quite interesting, but I'm afraid it is not Wikipedia material. It should go on Chick Wiki instead if it's not already there. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of John Casey (Chuck)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ComicCon2011":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Casey (Chuck). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)