Kylie and Garibay (EP) is currently an Albums good article nominee. Nominated by Damian Vo (talk) at 15:39, 18 September 2023 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Australia: Music C‑class Low‑importance Kylie and Garibay (EP) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Electronic music C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Bobbychan193, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 16 July 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles Kylie Minogue C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kylie Minogue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kylie Minogue on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kylie MinogueWikipedia:WikiProject Kylie MinogueTemplate:WikiProject Kylie MinogueKylie Minogue articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Music C‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kylie + Garibay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130310233710/https://www.apra.com.au/cms/worksearch/worksearch.srvlt to https://www.apra.com.au/cms/worksearch/worksearch.srvlt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This article looks pretty solid to me, at least at first glance, and may meet Good article criteria. @CaliforniaDreamsFan: Thanks for expanding! I'm curious if you have any interest in nominating this article for Good status. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

... or, perhaps User:Damian Vo? :) ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I am interested in bringing this to GA and adding some new sources. I'll try to get this article done in the next few weeks. I've seen your comments on this article for many years now, hopefully, this time I can help improve this to GA. Additional comments from experienced editors like you will be greatly appreciated! Cheers! Damian Vo (talk) 17:27, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Like ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Another Believer: Also while you're here, I have a question regarding the EP: should this and the duo page be re-titled to Kylie + Garibay instead? Sources from Billboard and WMG referred to the EP by this name. Another example is the duo You+Me, who also uses the plus sign in their bio and album page, not "You and Me". Damian Vo (talk) 06:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hmm, good question, but I'm not 100% sure. I would think "and" is preferred over "+" per the Manual of Style, but you might need to comb Wikipedia:Article titles for more info. Or, if you think sourcing overwhelming supports "+", then feel free to submit a move request. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 11:46, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! A week went by and I have finished expanding this article. I have submitted it for a GAN and it would be great if you have a look at it when you have the time. Have a great rest of the week! Cheers! Damian Vo (talk) 15:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks good! Good luck at GAN ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]