Article (edit | visual edit | history ) · Article talk (edit | history ) · Watch
Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs ) 07:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
Dead links found. Should be removed.
Either remove or correct the dead links, and I'll provide a GA status. Rest all checks out fine. Waiting for the above changes. ASHU IND 07:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
* Done ASHU IND 11:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
It is reasonably well written .
a (prose) : b (MoS for lead , layout , word choice , fiction , and lists ) :
Not much concerns here. Fixed some of the problem I found ASHU IND 11:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
It is factually accurate and verifiable .
a (references) : b (citations to reliable sources ) : c (OR ) :
No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. Few dead links were found and removed. ASHU IND 11:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
It is broad in its coverage .
a (major aspects) : b (focused) :
All such aspects have been covered. ASHU IND 11:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
It follows the neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
Fine here.
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by images , where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales ) : b (appropriate use with suitable captions ) :
All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU IND 11:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
Keep up the good quality of Article. Don't let it delisted.
Regards.
ASHU IND 11:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC) [ reply ]